Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
_NameLess_

Comments Manager Module Error [Using/Uninstall] || Comments NOT working 2.7.2

Recommended Posts

Hello, 

thanks for the help the other day. 

I continued to configure/code my page like I want it. Now i was going to add comments. 

I installed the Comments Manager Module under "processwire/module/edit?name=ProcessCommentsManager". 

It got installed and I can see the menuoption under "setup", called: Comments.

Problem: 

It does not matter what link I press. Everyone shows the following error. Even uninstalling shows this error. 

Page: /processwire/setup/comments/

Error: 

Fatal error: Class 'Comment' not found in /var/www/testsite/wire/modules/Process/ProcessCommentsManager/ProcessCommentsManager.module on line 80

I am using Processwire 2.7.2.

Is anyone here who can help me sorting this problem out?

Best regards

EDIT: I just realized that this might be the wrong section of the forum. If so, please move this thread. Thanks!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Short Update: 

I debugged it to the best I can and I found out that the problem lies directly with the Comment Fieldtype. 
The module after install is not recognized as loaded.
To be precise: It is not listed under "installed modules" in the debug tools. 

It says it is installed though. 

So, as the required module is not loaded. It is of course not possible to load/find the Comment-class. 

I will try to look into it more but I think this might be the end for me as I don't know where modules are loaded.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi @_NameLess_,

Not a great start, eh? :-) Welcome to the forums.

I am going to test in a minute but I have not seen this error before. It seems to me you installed the module on your own custom path? Is there a reason for that? i.e. you should let PW determine the path.

Is this a local install or remote? 

I'll test and get back to you

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And we are back...

I now recall I have seen this error before (when I was playing around with enhancing the Comments Manager). Yeah, the error is not very intuitive. ProcessCommentsManager should at least catch the error and give a more informative message. What is happening is this. In line #92, Comments manager is calling a constant from the Comment Class. The Comment Class is not a module but a .php file. It is loaded/required_once in FieldtypeComments.module line #22. So, unless you at created at least one field of type Comments, you will get that error. That field does not have even have to be added to a template yet for this to work. If such a field is present, it calls FieldtypeComments.module which in turn loads the Comment.php class and everything is fine and dandy. 

So, long story short, first create a field of type Comments before attempting to load ProcessCommentsManager. I would also file a request on GitHub for @ryan to consider catching the above error and returning a more meaningful error message for supersusers.

Edited by kongondo
  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello, I am reading this forum for quite a while now.. and try to stay and help where I can. But I have to learn it first. ;)

I tried your solution and IT WORKS! Many times a solution is much more simply than one is thinking. ;)

I am going to test in a minute but I have not seen this error before. It seems to me you installed the module on your own custom path? Is there a reason for that? i.e. you should let PW determine the path.

Normal installation. No custom path involved ;)

So, long story short, first create a field of type Comments before attempting to load ProcessCommentsManager. I would also file a request on GitHub for @ryan to consider catching the above error and returning a more meaningful error message for supersusers.

Thanks again!

I tried to dig up a few things and only found out that the "FieldtypeComments"-module is not loaded when looking via debug-tools -> modules. Therefore I assumed there is some error. 

Should I write this bug report or will you/ryan? 

Also maybe good to work on: If CommentsManager is installed, it is impossible to uninstall. And it is also impossible to uninstall the CommentsModule as CommentsManager is installed. 

=> You really need a field, to uninstall. I think install/uninstall should work without the needing of a field. 

Have a nice day!

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Robin S
      A community member raised a question and I thought a new sanitizer method for the purpose would be useful, hence...
      Sanitizer Transliterate
      Adds a transliterate method to $sanitizer that performs character replacements as defined in the module config. The default character replacements are based on the defaults from InputfieldPageName, but with uppercase characters included too.
      Usage
      Install the Sanitizer Transliterate module.
      Customise the character replacements in the module config as needed.
      Use the sanitizer on strings like so:
      $transliterated_string = $sanitizer->transliterate($string);
       
      https://github.com/Toutouwai/SanitizerTransliterate
      https://modules.processwire.com/modules/sanitizer-transliterate/
       
    • By dimitrios
      Hello,
      this module can publish content of a Processwire page on a Facebook page, triggered by saving the Processwire page.
      To set it up, configure the module with a Facebook app ID, secret and a Page ID. Following is additional configuration on Facebook for developers:
      Minimum Required Facebook App configuration:
      on Settings -> Basics, provide the App Domains, provide the Site URL, on Settings -> Advanced, set the API version to 2.10, add Product: Facebook Login, on Facebook Login -> Settings, set Client OAuth Login: Yes, set Web OAuth Login: Yes, set Enforce HTTPS: Yes, add "http://www.example.com/processwire/page/" to field Valid OAuth Redirect URIs. This module is configurable as follows:
      Templates: posts can take place only for pages with the defined templates. On/Off switch: specify a checkbox field that will not allow the post if checked. Specify a message and/or an image for the post.
      Usage
      edit the desired PW page and save; it will post right after the initial Facebook log in and permission granting. After that, an access token is kept.
       
      Download
      PW module directory: http://modules.processwire.com/modules/auto-fb-post/ Github: https://github.com/kastrind/AutoFbPost   Note: Facebook SDK for PHP is utilized.


    • By thomasaull
      I created a little helper module to trigger a CI pipeline when your website has been changed. It's quite simple and works like this: As soon as you save a page the module sets a Boolean via a pages save after hook. Once a day via LazyCron the module checks if the Boolean is set and sends a POST Request to a configurable Webhook URL.
      Some ideas to extend this:
      make request type configurable (GET, POST) make the module trigger at a specified time (probably only possible with a server cronjob) trigger manually Anything else? If there's interest, I might put in some more functionality. Let me know what you're interested in. Until then, maybe it is useful for a couple of people 🙂
      Github Repo: https://github.com/thomasaull/CiTrigger
    • By Robin S
      I created this module a while ago and never got around to publicising it, but it has been outed in the latest PW Weekly so here goes the support thread...
      Unique Image Variations
      Ensures that all ImageSizer options and focus settings affect image variation filenames.

      Background
      When using methods that produce image variations such as Pageimage::size(), ProcessWire includes some of the ImageSizer settings (height, width, cropping location, etc) in the variation filename. This is useful so that if you change these settings in your size() call a new variation is generated and you see this variation on the front-end.
      However, ProcessWire does not include several of the other ImageSizer settings in the variation filename:
      upscaling cropping, when set to false or a blank string interlace sharpening quality hidpi quality focus (whether any saved focus area for an image should affect cropping) focus data (the top/left/zoom data for the focus area) This means that if you change any of these settings, either in $config->imageSizerOptions or in an $options array passed to a method like size(), and you already have variations at the requested size/crop, then ProcessWire will not create new variations and will continue to serve the old variations. In other words you won't see the effect of your changed ImageSizer options on the front-end until you delete the old variations.
      Features
      The Unique Image Variations module ensures that any changes to ImageSizer options and any changes to the focus area made in Page Edit are reflected in the variation filename, so new variations will always be generated and displayed on the front-end.
      Installation
      Install the Unique Image Variations module.
      In the module config, set the ImageSizer options that you want to include in image variation filenames.
      Warnings
      Installing the module (and keeping one or more of the options selected in the module config) will cause all existing image variations to be regenerated the next time they are requested. If you have an existing website with a large number of images you may not want the performance impact of that. The module is perhaps best suited to new sites where image variations have not yet been generated.
      Similarly, if you change the module config settings on an existing site then all image variations will be regenerated the next time they are requested.
      If you think you might want to change an ImageSizer option in the future (I'm thinking here primarily of options such as interlace that are typically set in $config->imageSizerOptions) and would not want that change to cause existing image variations to be regenerated then best to not include that option in the module config after you first install the module.
       
      https://github.com/Toutouwai/UniqueImageVariations
      https://modules.processwire.com/modules/unique-image-variations/
    • By Sebi
      I've created a small module which lets you define a timestamp after which a page should be accessible. In addition you can define a timestamp when the release should end and the page should not be accessable any more.
      ProcessWire-Module: http://modules.processwire.com/modules/page-access-releasetime/
      Github: https://github.com/Sebiworld/PageAccessReleasetime
      Usage
      PageAccessReleasetime can be installed like every other module in ProcessWire. Check the following guide for detailed information: How-To Install or Uninstall Modules
      After that, you will find checkboxes for activating the releasetime-fields at the settings-tab of each page. You don't need to add the fields to your templates manually.
      Check e.g. the checkbox "Activate Releasetime from?" and fill in a date in the future. The page will not be accessable for your users until the given date is reached.
      If you have $config->pagefileSecure = true, the module will protect files of unreleased pages as well.
      How it works
      This module hooks into Page::viewable to prevent users to access unreleased pages:
      public function hookPageViewable($event) { $page = $event->object; $viewable = $event->return; if($viewable){ // If the page would be viewable, additionally check Releasetime and User-Permission $viewable = $this->canUserSee($page); } $event->return = $viewable; } To prevent access to the files of unreleased pages, we hook into Page::isPublic and ProcessPageView::sendFile.
      public function hookPageIsPublic($e) { $page = $e->object; if($e->return && $this->isReleaseTimeSet($page)) { $e->return = false; } } The site/assets/files/ directory of pages, which isPublic() returns false, will get a '-' as prefix. This indicates ProcessWire (with activated $config->pagefileSecure) to check the file's permissions via PHP before delivering it to the client.
      The check wether a not-public file should be accessable happens in ProcessPageView::sendFile. We throw an 404 Exception if the current user must not see the file.
      public function hookProcessPageViewSendFile($e) { $page = $e->arguments[0]; if(!$this->canUserSee($page)) { throw new Wire404Exception('File not found'); } } Additionally we hook into ProcessPageEdit::buildForm to add the PageAccessReleasetime fields to each page and move them to the settings tab.
      Limitations
      In the current version, releasetime-protected pages will appear in wire('pages')->find() queries. If you want to display a list of pages, where pages could be releasetime-protected, you should double-check with $page->viewable() wether the page can be accessed. $page->viewable() returns false, if the page is not released yet.
      If you have an idea how unreleased pages can be filtered out of ProcessWire selector queries, feel free to write an issue, comment or make a pull request!
×
×
  • Create New...