kongondo Posted December 10, 2015 Share Posted December 10, 2015 A temporary fix in response to this requestProcessCommentsManagerEnhanced This is a slightly enhanced version of the current core ProcessCommentsManager. I've tested it in the current dev version of PW and it works fine. I cannot provide any guarantees nor support the module though ....it is a working-nicely-proof-of-concept. DownloadGitHub InstallJust like any other ProcessWire module. It requires FieldtypeComments to be installed. You do not need to install ProcessCommentsManager. Demo Screen 10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter Knight Posted December 10, 2015 Share Posted December 10, 2015 That's very cool - thank you I won't be able to use this without hearing the music :-/ 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter Knight Posted December 10, 2015 Share Posted December 10, 2015 Is the plan to merge this with the current CommentsManager or keep it separate? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kongondo Posted December 10, 2015 Author Share Posted December 10, 2015 No. This is just a quick fix and Ryan's implementation will most likely be better than mine . You might want to better draw his attention to your request though via GitHub, and if you wish, point him to this quick fix. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ukyo Posted December 14, 2015 Share Posted December 14, 2015 @kongondo Thanks for your module ! I made a pull-request for separating status urls from status labels. I opened an issue for original ProcessCommentsManager, because problem coming from the original module. On my side i am using your module with my changes its look like working well ! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
naldrocks98 Posted December 18, 2015 Share Posted December 18, 2015 error here when i installed this one.. also in the part of ProcessComment module... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kongondo Posted December 18, 2015 Author Share Posted December 18, 2015 I remember seeing that one. I think you need to create a comments field first, IIRC (as a workaround). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kongondo Posted April 20, 2016 Author Share Posted April 20, 2016 Forgot to note here that the ideas here have now (have since Dec 2015!) been implemented in the core (ProcessCommentsManager). 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now