karian

On 4/5/2022 at 1:53 PM, horst said:

SMTP is not IMAP. Maybe you can setup your SMTP server to send a copy into your desired subfolder, or simply use the BCC header with every outgoing email for that.

see: https://www.socketlabs.com/blog/smtp-or-imap/

 

Thanks @horst ! Sending a copy or using the bcc header is actually a good solution.

I'll explore this way.

After all that,  I still don't understand how the "https://www.../form-builder/?view_file=..." form builder url could end up being referenced by Google.

It's an url generated by form builder, so it can't be crawled by Google bots (even in the situation in which "Files Path" is not configured correctly with a private folder)...

Solved it by changing the hash functions in site/modules/FormBuilder/FormBuilderMain.php, thus invalidating old urls from working.

A configuration for this hash could be exposed directly from the admin, useful to reset access to hundreds of files without erasing them.

I realized we still need this form-builder special url access to share files among the team and non-admin members.

A good solution would be the possibility to change the auto-generated url suffix (sequence of letters and numbers)...

Looking into it.

People are still complaining about access from url "https://www.../form-builder/?view_file=...".

Is it possible to protect this url for admin only viewing ?

Hi everyone,

Sending emails with WireMailSmtp works well but I would like to reflect sent emails on the email server "Sent" folder.

Similar as what's discussed here. Someone mentions using imap_append ...

Does anyone have a solution for WireMailSmtp?

@fliwire thanks.

I found the problem, my "form uploaded files" folder was not configured properly.

As said in the form-builder plugin settings, the folder should start with a dot to ensure it's not http accessible (see image). 

Hi,

One of our clients, an art fair, uses the formbuilder plugin to gather applications from artists.

Artists fill a form with a pdf of their work in order to apply.

As one of the artists complained, the problem is that their file (managed by the formbuilder plugin) is public and referenced by Google.

The url looks like "https://www.../form-builder/?view_file=...".

Is there a way to protect the file or a least prevent it being referenced by Google ?

Thanks !



 

Saving only 200 items with the method in the previous post takes several minutes in production.

How do we optimize this and where is the repeater api reference page ? Someone has a clue ?

Maybe that can help :

Hi everyone,

I have a repeater inside a repeater (two nested levels).

These repeaters are populated via the api.

  $page->of(false);
  for ($x = 0; $x <= 10; $x++) {
    // first level repeater item
    $repeaterItem = $page->repeater->getNew();
    for ($y = 0; $y <= 10; $y++) {
      // second level repeater item
      $nestedRepeaterItem = $repeaterItem->nestedRepeater->getNew();
      // edit item
      $nestedRepeaterItem->someField = "some datas";
      // save item
      $repeaterItem->save();
      // $nestedRepeaterItem->save();
      // $repeaterItem->nestedRepeater->add($nestedRepeaterItem);
    }
    // save item
    $repeaterItem->save();
    // $page->repeater->add($repeaterItem);
  }
  // save page
  $version->save();

To obtain the expected result, I oddly had to use this command (twice) :

$repeaterItem->save();

Commented lines are what I thought would be right, but if I do I end up with several times the same repeater items.

@Soma your example suggest:

...

$item->save();
        
// add the repeater item to the page
$mypage->teasers->add($item);

...

But it didn't work in the nested situation above, any idea why ?

The only answer I see is that ->getNew() takes care of adding the item inside the repeater (maybe a recent addition to the api).

Cheers

I don't know why multiple instances (repeater_repeat_columns1, repeater_repeat_columns2, ...) of my repeater field are displayed inside Template field (see image).

Is there a way to clean/reset it ?

Hi, based on the work of @microcipcip and @gebeer  (see their posts here and here), I put together a Processwire + React boilerplate (profile).

Github repo: https://github.com/lapico/process-react

Cheers,
K