Peter Knight

I solved it. This was really odd so I'm glad I found it.

The test page I created and had the 403 error on was called /test/ 

Renaming it to anything other than /test/ worked

I used the Finder to search for other pages with the same name and there was a page in the trash created by a repeater called /test/

Normally you'd get an alert when naming a page that there was a similar named page and PW would suggest test-1

I wonder if that's worth putting into GitHub as a bug.

Update:

If I edit the home template, I see the following. I don't know if it applies to my issue because the 403 is shown to the superuser,

I'm getting an error 403 Forbidden when a superuser tries to view any unpublished page and I'm trying to track it down.

If I goto Access > Roles > superuser I don't see any permissions but note the "Note: superuser role always has all permissions, so permissions field is not shown." 

If I visit Access > Permissions > Page View, I don't see anything that is unticked etc

I then thought it might be a permission issue on a template level but there's no template-level permissions set there either.

Any ideas on next steps?

Thanks

33 minutes ago, Wanze said:

@Peter Knight

That's because the opposite (index,follow) is assumed by default and you do not need the meta tags at all in this case. The module does only render them if you have checked at least one (noindex or nofollow).

Thanks. I updated my post just before I saw this. Never realised that!

17 hours ago, Wanze said:

Hi @Peter Knight,

$page->seo->robots->render() should work fine, but it only outputs the tags if you have checked any of the noIndex or noFollow options.

Cheers

Something must not be setup properly at my end.

Using the following

<?php echo $page->seo->robots->render(); ?>

I can get a page to produce this

<meta name="robots" content="noindex, nofollow">

Regardless of what I try, I cannot get SEOMaestro to produce the opposite 

<meta name="robots" content="index, follow">

@Wanze UPDATED: After a little more research, I have discovered that index, follow are the default for search engines and don't need to be specified so it appears as if your module is functioning as it should.

In the Admin itself, I have the following set

• Fields > seo > Robots = both unchecked
• Page 01 > seo >  Robots > NoIndex = Inherit =  unchecked. Prevent... = checked
• Page 01 > seo >  Robots >  NoFollow = Inherit =  unchecked. Prevent... = checked

Result on Page 1 output

<meta name="robots" content="noindex, nofollow">

On the other hand, if I do this

• Fields > seo > Robots = both unchecked
• Page 01 > seo >  Robots > NoIndex = Inherit =  unchecked. 
• Page 01 > seo >  Robots >  NoFollow = Inherit =  unchecked. 

Output is blank.

I'll bypass it for the moment and make a custom field but it'd be good to know what I might be doing incorrectly if you get a chance.

6 hours ago, Juergen said:

Hello @Peter Knight

I think that there is no render tag method for the robot tags, but you can use the following:

$page->seo->robots->data['noIndex']
$page->seo->robots->data['noFollow']

This returns true if 'no index' was choosen and true if 'no follow' was choosen. Create the meta tags by yourself and use PHP to fill in these values into the meta tags.

Best regards Jürgen

Thanks Juergen. I’ll try that. What are the data and square brackets in terms of PHP and the API?

You have so many options. But if it’s a simple gallery, you could have all the images within a single images field. 

Im not sure what you mean by “catalog the photos” but you could look at image tags. 

Alternatively ive created galleries where I needed to create a separate page for each gallery. 

Hi @Wanze
 

If we want to output just the opengraph tags, the instructions provided work
`echo $page->seo->opengraph->render();`

But what is the syntax to just echo the robots tag ?

`echo $page->seo->robots;`
Outputs 'RobotsSeoData'

`echo $page->seo->robots->render();`
Outputs nothing

Thanks Dragan. This has bugged me for ages and seems to be finally be the fix 

Occasionally when I goto Modules > Upgrades I get the following type of error.

There's actually about three of them and each one mentions a different line. In the example below, line 266 is

$new = version_compare($versions[$name]['remote'], $versions[$name]['local']);

( ! ) Notice: Undefined index: local in /Users/peterknight/Sites/mysite.com/site/assets/cache/FileCompiler/site/modules/ProcessWireUpgrade/ProcessWireUpgradeCheck.module on line 266
Call Stack
#	Time	Memory	Function	Location
1	0.0011	405040	{main}( )	.../index.php:0
2	0.2602	5197688	ProcessWire\ProcessPageView->execute( )	.../index.php:55
3	0.2602	5198064	ProcessWire\ProcessPageView->__call( )	.../index.php:55
4	0.2602	5198064	ProcessWire\WireHooks->runHooks( )	.../Wire.php:442
5	0.2603	5198480	ProcessWire\ProcessPageView->_callMethod( )	.../WireHooks.php:733
6	0.2603	5198480	ProcessWire\ProcessPageView->___execute( )	.../Wire.php:383
7	0.3009	5463888	ProcessWire\Page->render( )	.../ProcessPageView.module:209
8	0.3009	5463944	ProcessWire\Page->__call( )	.../ProcessPageView.module:209
9	0.3009	5463944	ProcessWire\WireHooks->runHooks( )	.../Wire.php:442
10	0.3015	5465248	ProcessWire\PageRender->renderPage( )	.../WireHooks.php:834
11	0.3015	5465624	ProcessWire\PageRender->__call( )	.../WireHooks.php:834
12	0.3015	5465624	ProcessWire\WireHooks->runHooks( )	.../Wire.php:442
13	0.3016	5466040	ProcessWire\PageRender->_callMethod( )	.../WireHooks.php:733
14	0.3016	5466040	ProcessWire\PageRender->___renderPage( )	.../Wire.php:383
15	0.3032	5470760	ProcessWire\TemplateFile->render( )	.../PageRender.module:514
16	0.3032	5470816	ProcessWire\TemplateFile->__call( )	.../PageRender.module:514
17	0.3032	5470816	ProcessWire\WireHooks->runHooks( )	.../Wire.php:442
18	0.3033	5471848	ProcessWire\TemplateFile->_callMethod( )	.../WireHooks.php:733
19	0.3033	5471848	ProcessWire\TemplateFile->___render( )	.../Wire.php:380
20	0.3036	5493112	require( '/Users/peterknight/Sites/mysite.com/site/assets/cache/FileCompiler/site/templates/admin.php' )	.../TemplateFile.php:287
21	0.3038	5493616	require( '/Users/peterknight/Sites/mysite.com/wire/modules/AdminTheme/AdminThemeUikit/controller.php' )	.../admin.php:15
22	0.3038	5495120	require( '/Users/peterknight/Sites/mysite.com/wire/core/admin.php' )	.../controller.php:15
23	0.3085	5586144	ProcessWire\ProcessController->execute( )	.../admin.php:135
24	0.3085	5586200	ProcessWire\ProcessController->__call( )	.../admin.php:135
25	0.3085	5586200	ProcessWire\WireHooks->runHooks( )	.../Wire.php:442
26	0.3085	5586616	ProcessWire\ProcessController->_callMethod( )	.../WireHooks.php:733
27	0.3085	5586616	ProcessWire\ProcessController->___execute( )	.../Wire.php:380
28	0.3108	5596744	ProcessWireUpgrade->execute( )	.../ProcessController.php:333
29	1.2224	8773000	ProcessWireUpgradeCheck->getVersions( )	.../ProcessWireUpgrade.module:187
30	1.2227	8776256	ProcessWireUpgradeCheck->getModuleVersions( )	.../ProcessWireUpgradeCheck.module:185

I've been living with it for a while and while it doesn't seem to stop me upgrading etc, I'd love to fix it.

Anyone recognise this type of error?

Quote

 It is also possible to combine strings and placeholders.The following example appends the company name after a page's title: {title} | acme.com.

What would you suggest if we want to add ' | mysite.com' to the end of every page title but only set it in a single source field.

In the example above, a user would need to add acme.com to every page.

MarkupSEO had a field called Title Format where you could specify the structure of the Meta Title whether it was inherited or custom and it was very useful.

The Sitename placeholder above was essentially an extra field in the config.

Could you consider something like this? I can't seem to add a custom field to the SEO module but would be happy to add one to my custom Settings page (a simple private PW page).

I think is an issue when the module Helper Field Links is installed with SeoMaestro

Note on the left screen, each field has display issues with the field name. I could probably hide it with some CSS but wondered if you'd consider making it work out of the box.

On 4/14/2019 at 6:06 PM, adrian said:

Actually @Peter Knight - you might try installing that version from scratch - I made several changes to fields and field types, so it might no longer be possible to simply upgrade from the old version.

I tracked down the culprit of the Image field not appearing in the Smart Image option of this module.

When an image field is set to Type=CroppableImages3, it is not recognised as an Images field.

Setting my Images field from CroppableImages3 back to plain old Image worked. Obviously, you then loose your CroppableImages3 function but this was just to prove a theory.

Not sure if this is something for you or @horst but just flagging here in case it's useful to anyone.

BTW, upgrading over the existing install seemed to work fine in general. It might be safer to install from scratch but that completely removes all my existing settings. I tried it on a development environment first. Phew!

1 minute ago, adrian said:

No need - that's just an error because PW doesn't like that I have added a .php extension to the module file when there is already a plain .module one installed. Just do a Modules > Refresh and you should be good.

Thanks Adrian. 

That looks interesting. So essentially, I have more customised SEO options on a page level. Thanks for the work on this.

I don't have the image field available yet. I might try creating a few other images fields and generally good around and see if I can track down the issue.

Should I uninstall the previous one first?

Quote

Compile Error: Cannot declare class MarkupSEO, because the name is already in use (line 12 of /domain.com /site/modules/MarkupSEO/MarkupSEO.module.php) 
This error message was shown because: site is in debug mode. ($config->debug = true; => /site/config.php). Error has been logged.

I'm using MarkupSEO 0.8.7

The Smart Image field which lets me select some image fields doesn't recognise one of an image field.

Not sure if I should be using a different version?

Thanks

Feature request, Mike. I know you're busy so just putting it out there.

I am logging 404 hits to a site that get's a ton of spam links. An old SEO spam issue which I am cleaning up.

Anyway, I notice that the jumplinks database table was becoming huge and had bloated to thousands of enties making the database itself very large.

That better house-keeping is my responsibility but wondered if a feature might be useful to optionally auto-delete these over a certain threshold. Or possibly send an email or notification that the logs were becoming quite big etc.

I'm really enjoying the Repeater Matrix field lately and always wished it could (optionally) be enhanced with some icons.

A client recently started using Frontify for their brand portal and I thought their implementation was neat.

Video attached. I also really like the categories and filtering.

What do you think @ryan ?

Hi @Pete 
Forums are looking much better. I personally find them easier to use with the updated theme.

FYI I notice the Developers Map is currently broken.

https://directory.processwire.com/map/

Hi guys

I have something working and I'm not sure it's the most efficient API usage. 

I want to display some content if the page is Vets or any sub page below Vets.

My tree structure looks like this:

Home
Doctors
Vets (ID 1116)
 - Vets sub page 01
 - Vets sub page 02
 - Vets sub page 03
 - - Vets sub sub page 01
 - - Vets sub sub page 02
 - Vets sub page 04
Pilots
Gardeners

My working code is:

<?php

if  
	(
	$page->matches('id=1116') // Page is Vets Overview
	||   // OR
	$page->parent->matches('id=1116')  // Parent Page is Vets Overview
	)

	{
	echo "My conditional content";
	}

?>

Thanks
P

Hi again @tpr

I notice on the code below I am getting both a data-srcset and a srcset too. Is this correct?

My input

<?php $myimage = $page->Images->first(); ?>
<img 
     class="lazyload"
     data-src="<?php echo $myimage->url ?>"
     data-srcset="<?php echo $myimage->srcset('800x0, /2, /3') ?>"
     alt="" 
 />

My output in browser

 <img class=" lazyloaded" 
 data-src="/site/assets/files/1/photo-steps-video.jpg" 
 data-srcset="
              /site/assets/files/1/photo-steps-video.800x0.jpg 800w,
              /site/assets/files/1/photo-steps-video.400x0.jpg 400w,
              /site/assets/files/1/photo-steps-video.266x0.jpg 266w" 
alt="" 
srcset="/site/assets/files/1/photo-steps-video.800x0.jpg 800w,
         /site/assets/files/1/photo-steps-video.400x0.jpg 400w,
         /site/assets/files/1/photo-steps-video.266x0.jpg 266w" 
src="/site/assets/files/1/photo-steps-video.jpg"
 >  

3 hours ago, kongondo said:

Just a reference, not necessarily that it would work in this case, but related. Tread with caution if you go this route!

Using multi-instance in PW3

https://processwire.com/blog/posts/multi-instance-pw3/

Thanks everyone. I might try the route mentioned above. 

3 minutes ago, cb2004 said:

I wouldn't explore multi-site anymore. You could spit out a feed from site A and read it on site B. You could even import them into site B. I am on mobile right now, but we do this quite regularly so could post an example when I am in the office. RSS, XML, lots of options. 

Thanks. That all sounds good. 

Hi guys

Is it possible to have a PW site display content from another PW site?

I've been reading about ProcessWire's Multi-site options and I don't think either is a way forward for me.

Both PW sites are separate installs with separate databases but crucially they are on the same VPS. So I'm hoping that's a good thing.

Basically, Site A has approx 100 reviews consisting of these fields

• Reviewer name
• Review
• Date

Instead of setting up the fields onto Site B and duplicating work and creating 100 pages, I want to *somehow* get site B to use a selector to fetch the necessary content from Site A.

In future, if I need to update the reviews, I can goto the 'source' Site A to do this.

On 3/1/2019 at 7:47 PM, wbmnfktr said:

Everything worked as expected as far as I can tell by now and I should be able to replace my previous set of fields with this module 

Are you replacing these manually or with some script?