Jump to content

Leaderboard


Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 10/06/2019 in all areas

  1. 6 points
    Hey folks, @kongondo asked me some questions about how I integrated vue.js into ModulesManager2. I was already planning to release a tutorial video of the integration process soon, but I don't have much time now as I am busy with customer work. So here is a quick roundup, which will be improved over time and become a full-blown tutorial. I hope to cover the basics and don't forget anything. How did you implement the integration? I created a new vue project via vue create . inside my site/modules/mymodule folder Do your assets still live under the Vue JS public folder? I don't exactly know what you mean with assets. Are you speaking of images? I don't use images atm. Where do your view files live, i.e. under your modules directory or in templates? As I mentioned in point one, they are in the modules directory. Here is a screenshot of my directory: As soon as I release the beta of ModulesManager2 you can go through the source code in github. Where is your index.xxx file and how are you serving it? vue-cli comes with a built in server and the index.html is automatically generated on-the-fly. The command for running the server with HMR (hot media reload) resides in the package.json and is run via npm run serve This is the standalone server. Anything else I should know (maybe .htaccess issues, etc)? Create a vue.config.js in your custom module's root directory and add following parameters to it, to disable filename hashing: const webpack = require("webpack"); module.exports = { runtimeCompiler: false, filenameHashing: false, pages: { main: { // entry for the page entry: 'src/main.js', // the source template template: 'public/index.html', // output as dist/index.html filename: 'index.html', // when using title option, // template title tag needs to be <title><%= htmlWebpackPlugin.options.title %></title> title: 'Index Page', } }, configureWebpack: { plugins: [ new webpack.ProvidePlugin({ $: 'jquery', jQuery: 'jquery', 'window.jQuery': 'jquery', }) ] } }; Edit: After creating the config run npm run build Then you can reference these files in your module like I did here: $markup = '<div id="app"></div>'; $scriptPath = $this->config->urls->siteModules . $this->className; $markup .= "<script src='$scriptPath/dist/js/chunk-vendors.js'></script>"; $markup .= "<script src='$scriptPath/dist/js/main.js'></script>"; I added the configureWebpack part to have access to the $ and jQuery objects inside of my vue files. The install/uninstall overlay panel in MM2, is that something custom or a ProcessWire panel? Standard ProcessWire panels If it is a ProcessWire panel, did you have any difficulties implementing it into your Vue app? ProcessWire's panel init happens before vue is initiated or rendered, so pw-panel links inside of vue are not catched. To make pw-panel links inside of vue work, you have to defer (don't know if this is the correct term) the process to a body click event: $(document).on("click", "#app .pw-panel", function (e, el) { e.preventDefault(); let toggler = $(this); pwPanels.addPanel(toggler); toggler.click(); }); I hope this helps. If you have questions, please ask.
  2. 4 points
    You need utf8mb4
  3. 3 points
    Have you set: $config->dbCharset = 'utf8mb4'; in config.php?
  4. 2 points
    Last week I worked primarily on GitHub issues, and did some of that this week as well. Likely I'll be doing a lot of this in October. Thank you for all of your reports. While there's already a lot of commits on the dev branch, I'm going to wait till next week to bump the version, as I've got some stuff in progress that I want to get committed first (more on that below). Next week I'm releasing version 40 of FormBuilder that supports paginated forms, as well as forms within forms (not to mention some other minor additions). Basically, all the stuff that was covered in this video from a few weeks ago, plus a little more. I actually think it's ready right now, but as is often the case, I started writing instructions for using the new features today and thought of a couple minor tweaks that would be helpful along the way. So I'm going to apply those early next week, finish the instructions, test it all out again, and then release it... likely mid-week next week. For the ProcessWire core, one feature people have been asking for for quite awhile is the ability to specify custom fields with file and image fields. I've been working on that here quite a bit this week, and have the initial test cases working quite nicely! Unlike the Description and Tags fields that come as built-in options with file and image fields, the new option instead uses a subset of ProcessWire's Fieldtype and Inputfield modules to support this (note: it does not use pages like repeaters do). This gives you more flexibility in defining what you want and how you want it to look. Though there are some limitations of what kinds of fields you can use here, but I think you will like what it offers and how it works. For those that just need a description and/or tags, then of course those features will remain as they are. But for those that need something more for file/image fields, you are going to have a whole lot of new options in 3.0.142. Unless I run into any roadblocks in finishing development of this part, I'll have it ready by this time next week along with a blog post that outlines it in more detail.
  5. 2 points
    Thanks @Jens Martsch - dotnetic! Excellent write-up. You've sort of answered the question. What I meant was if you had images and such would they still live under /public? Thanks. I thought the integration would have required to point to a different index.xxx (maybe an index.php) file inside ModulesManager2's folder. Good to know this is not the case. I suppose then that the API endpoint in ModulesManager2 is execute()? A lot! Thanks.
  6. 2 points
    Also make sure that the "data" field/column in the field_body table is set to utf8mb4
  7. 2 points
    Hey Bernhard! A few initial observations and notes – I will have to dig into your post deeper and check the video when I'm back home. On a trip at Spain at the moment, and the network connection here is... limited πŸ™‚ First of all I still find the idea of themes intriguing, but it's also a complex matter, and there are different aspects to consider. For an example WordPress has (as most here probably know) made great effort to support themes – yet in reality you cannot just switch between themes as you want (which is, in my opinion, a key point in the themes vs. starting profiles discussion) if you have something "out of the ordinary" going on: custom fields, custom views, plugins generating markup, etc. Wireframe doesn't actually try to solve the theming part. In fact it's quite the opposite: it's a framework that provides sensible structure for sites built with ProcessWire – one that separates the implementation into different files/classes ("business logic" vs. views vs. layouts and so on) in a meaningful way, allows for reusability, and continues to make sense even if/when the site scales. While it can be easy to make visual changes to a site built with wireframe – as long as it's used in its entirety, in which case making changes to a single layout file is often all you need – that's really the extent of it. The kind of things you've mentioned, like getting the framework and setting things up, are in that context resolved with site profiles: if you find yourself repeating these tasks over and over, you should build a site profile where you've got the defaults nailed down – or, if you find you often just swap the logo etc. then add a settings area and a custom field for it. The "official" Wireframe boilerplate is one of those, and here at Avoine we've got our own "boilerplate" specifically tailored for the type of sites we work with (and what you've listed are (some of the) things we've covered in it). Long story short: I think we're solving different problems, and as such I wouldn't draw too many lines between those two solutions πŸ™‚ I do agree that you're onto something here, though, and see a need for that. The way you've described RockThemes sounds pretty close to how WordPress works, although I've not had the chance to dig into all the details yet. For an example I don't have a good idea about how much you're planning to let a specific theme override vs. how much you plan to keep things "set in stone". That, I think, is actually one of the most important factors here: figuring out how much you can/should standardise stuff, and if one can "break loose" of the theme by overriding it in a way that changes it radically. ... and that, of course, depends on how far you want to go in terms of "themeability": if one wants to switch a theme and it should always "just work", you might go as far as define basic views and features (such list and archive views etc.) so that theme authors know what to provide markup/logic and styles for. On the other hand if it's enough that the layout is interchangeable and all content types (templates) that don't follow some specific convention (title and body fields, or something like that) will need per-site markup, then a much simpler approach is going to be quite enough. My "a few initial observations" got a bit out of hand, but I'll definitely check the video etc. later. And sorry if I've missed any important points here πŸ™‚
  8. 1 point
    Due to a discussion here in the forums, I was inspired to finally have a take on datetime fields and see if I couldn't get them to be searched a little more conveniently. Here's a small module - still in alpha state, but I'd be happy to get some feedback - that allows searching for individual components of a date like year, month, day, hour or even day_of_week or day_of_year, and also returning them. Github repo: DatetimeAdvanced Current version: 0.0.5 Tested in: ProcessWire 2.8 + 3.0 Possible subfields: day month year hour minute second day_of_week day_of_year week_of_year Examples: // Database search: $pagelist = $pages->find("mydatefield.year=2016"); // Filtering PageArray in memory: $maypages = $pagelist->filter("mydatefield.month=5"); // Back to our starting point: $start = date('z'); $end = $start + 7; $sevendays = $pages->find("mydatefield.day_of_year>=$start, mydatefield.day_of_year<$end"); // Nice side effect: subfields are now directly accessible $blogentry = $pages->get('blog-entry-1'); echo $blogentry->title . "(" . $blogentry->publishdate->year . ")"; // New in 0.0.4: shorthand methods echo $blogentry->publishdate->strftime("%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S") . PHP_EOL; echo $blogentry->publishdate->date("Y-m-d H:i:s") . PHP_EOL; ToDos for the future: See if there's a possibility to specify ranges more conveniently Check if this can perhaps wiggle its way into the PW core Changes: example for direct subfield access and shorthand methods to strftime() and date() added.
  9. 1 point
    Ohh it works now - Thank you very much and sorry for the problem. 😍
  10. 1 point
  11. 1 point
    @ryan Oh WOW, a dream comes true! 😍 😍 😍 😍 😍 😍 😍 😍 😍 😍 😍 😍 😍 😍
  12. 1 point
    Try hooking after ProcessPageEdit::buildForm. ProcessPageEdit::buildFormContent only contains the page template fields and not the fields from the Children, Settings, etc tabs. Another hurdle is that the value of InputfieldPageAutocomplete is always an array, and ProcessPageEdit expects the value of the parent_id field to be an integer. This seems to be working: $wire->addHookAfter('ProcessPageEdit::buildForm', function(HookEvent $event) { /* @var InputfieldWrapper $form */ $form = $event->return; $orig_pi_field = $form->getChildByName('parent_id'); $attrs = [ 'collapsed', 'required', 'label', 'icon', 'id', 'name', 'value', ]; $new_pi_field = $event->wire('modules')->get('InputfieldPageAutocomplete'); $form->insertAfter($new_pi_field, $orig_pi_field); $form->remove($orig_pi_field); foreach($attrs as $attr) { $new_pi_field->$attr = $orig_pi_field->$attr; } $new_pi_field->maxSelectedItems = 1; }); $wire->addHookAfter('ProcessPageEdit::processInput', function(HookEvent $event) { /* @var InputfieldWrapper $form */ $form = $event->arguments(0); if($form->id !== 'ProcessPageEditSettings') return; $pi_field = $form->getChildByName('parent_id'); if(!$pi_field || !$pi_field->isChanged()) return; $parent_id = $pi_field->value; $parent_id = (int) reset($parent_id); /* @var Page $page */ $page = $event->object->getPage(); $page->parent_id = $parent_id; });
  13. 1 point
    @horst Great, thanks for the explanation. Despite such rare errors I personally prefer those loose connections between Dev (local), Staging and Production, compared to the stricter ones you usually need with Craft.
  14. 1 point
    @Lutz Heckelmann Oh, thanks a lot! Now I know what is missing. The column filedata is available in my local version, but is missing in the live version. Only difference between the upgrades from local and live is, that the local one was updated step by step since the last two years, as it is symlinked to my pw-dev-latest directory, but the live one was updated from 3.0.62 to 3.0.130 in one go. So, now I will alter the table to add this missing column. EDIT: Issue solved! πŸ™‚
  15. 1 point
    For anyone stumbling over this topic, here's the solution (don't forget this is not production code - sanitize your data!). Make sure you are adding the Querystring (Qs) lib somehow axios.post('./', Qs.stringify({ yes_no: this.yes_no }), { headers: { 'X-Requested-With': 'XMLHttpRequest', 'Content-type': 'application/x-www-form-urlencoded' } }) .then(function (response) { console.log("response:", response.data); }) .catch(function (error) { console.log("error:", error); });
  16. 1 point
    Just a short update: if MySQL (or the OS it's running on) and PHP are configured with different time zones, results will be wrong. You'll likely not notice anything off on local dev environments where everything is configured with the same time zone, but to prevent issues on deployment, MySQL needs to be made timezone-aware and PW's database connections need to tell MySQL which timezone to use for conversions, which should IMHO be done through a not-yet-existing $config property. That's why I've filed feature request #19. I'm now holding my fingers crossed and waiting to hear if it gets considered. This will mean that, assuming it does, the module will require at least the PW version that gets the new $config property.
Γ—
Γ—
  • Create New...