Leaderboard

Each students and pets table is its own template, each row a page. For a limited set of repeating information like your pet type, a page reference field is most often the way to go. The "pet type" pages can live anywhere in the page tree and can optionally have a PHP template to list all pets of that type. The pets-students relationship can be defined as a page reference field linking from the pet to the student, from the student to the pet or, if you plan to implement complex selectors later on, using the Connect Page Fields module also both ways. The page reference fields can be limited to only show pages with a certain template (student, pet, pet type). Names and age should be regular (text, integer) fields. You could re-use the mandatory title field for the student and pet name and just change the label for it in the individual template's settings. I'd probably also create a "pets" and "students" template (plural) under which the individual entries live in the backend to keep things sorted and allow outputting lists. Home (or another common parent page) Students Heather Rachel ... Pets Rex Thomas ... Pet Type Dog Cat ...

Hi everybody! And thanks for Processwire! The Leaflet Map module appears to have the same issue that the gmap-based Map Marker Map module. The map will not render if placed inside ajax-driven repeater item as one of its data fields because there's no leaflet map initialization after the ajax call. Here's a small fix to be added at the bottom of InputfieldLeafletMapMarker.js file: //A patch for displaying the map inside ajax repeater items $(".InputfieldHeader").on('click',function(event) { window.setTimeout(function(){ var $t = $(event.target).siblings('.InputfieldContent').find('.InputfieldLeafletMapMarkerMap'); InputfieldLeafletMapMarker.init($t.attr('id'), $t.attr('data-lat'), $t.attr('data-lng'), $t.attr('data-zoom'), $t.attr('data-type'), $t.attr('data-provider')); },500); }); }); The delay is rather arbitrary, 500 ms works for me.

I've used ProcessWire for very similar things, and will continue to use ProcessWire for those things in future. In fact I have a project coming up soon for competition entries and will be using ProcessWire. I always see ProcessWire as a Content Management Framework over a Content Management System.

He is ?

v0.0.4 fixes the bug mentioned by @kongondo, thank you! v0.0.5 adds a check to load assets only once

Hi @kongondo thx for your improvements! Thx, I've moved the module to github. I'll do that for all my public modules. The workflow is now the same for me (it somehow didn't work before so I stayed with GitLab) and the pw modules directory does also only auto-update versions from github, not gitlab. I've merged your changes. You forgot to change one occurance of id/name change. Not sure if/why it really didn't work before the changes. Can't really believe that ? Please try version 0.0.2 https://github.com/BernhardBaumrock/MathParser/commit/3b09d501b86df06f4502f8415db9a74d13ac5d23#diff-c4d3faaaa59bb6d7e0d306c2c1312e13L125

Seems the version is not bumped to 3.0.116.

It is a know issue that the labels on website are updated after a few hours or sometimes even days, but the links actually point to the newest dev version. Just download by clicking the button and check .../wire/core/ProcessWire.php. To make sure what you got see the version constants in the source: class ProcessWire extends Wire {...

If you use the ProcessWireUpgrade module you always get the latest development branch with all new commits. Even if the version number is not bumped up. Just download the newest dev version again. ?

from this github issue: https://github.com/bmewburn/vscode-intelephense/issues/135 So in a future release intelephense might also work server-side (if I understand this comment correctly)...

@jmartsch: are these admin pages regular pages open in ProcessPageEdit, custom Process modules or pages added through AdminCustomFiles? In each of these cases, the answers might be a bit different.

haha, sorry, totally missed that ?

@Gideon So I also can't seem to download 3.0.116. Both the Website and ProcessWireUpgrade module report 3.0.115 being latest.

There are different libs out there which convert existing HTML and CSS to a PDF. If I create a Bitmap graphic out of the website, the PDF would not be searchable. So converting to a bitmap is not a solution for me. Looping over the fields and generating own markup would be the exact same process as if I did it on the frontend. I have to take every single fieldtype into account and render it accordingly. This is one thing ProcessWire's admin already does. Although this solution would be a lot cleaner with simpler HTML. Then I would create an own stylesheet and generate the PDF out of it. As I said before, I would not like to do this. But it might be an option.

I guess it would be the easiest to setup a function that loops over all fields of the edit form, creates a simple HTML table (or floating divs could also be an option) and populates all the values with outputformatting turned on. Rendering the original admin HTML into pdf will bring you a lot of bloat and I guess it will be hard to make that look pretty (actually I think it will be hard to even make it work at all, at least with RockPDF (mpdf), because it does not support all kinds of css and you also have some JS magic in the pw admin...).

What exactly are you trying to do? I guess you want to create some sort of reports? https://parall.ax/products/jspdf could also be an option. But generating a PDF from the markup of the adminpage will definitely need some additional work. I'm curious what you come up with. Could also need a good solution ?

If you hook after Page::render you can assign $event->return to a variable and use that.

I sent him a PM to be sure, new threads and mentions are probably easy to miss.

Shot in the dark here, what happens if you disable short tags and change your template files to use normal tags?